Neurologist Anand Venkatraman on Wednesday joined the continued debate over the medicinal properties of cow urine (gomutra), defending its advantages and dismissing criticism as baseless. In a tweet, Venkatraman asserted, “The hate for cow urine is dumb and irrational. Cow milk is way dirtier, has extra pus cells, micro organism, pores and skin, and hair than cow urine. Uncooked cow milk can provide you Salmonella, Listeria, and E. coli. Urine from wholesome cows is sterile and accommodates antibacterial compounds.”
Venkatraman’s remarks come amid a heated discourse sparked by IIT Madras Director Prof V Kamakoti, who not too long ago praised the medicinal properties of cow urine. Talking at an occasion on January 15, Kamakoti claimed that gomutra has “anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, and digestive properties” and will be an efficient remedy for situations like Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). Nevertheless, his feedback drew sharp criticism, with detractors labeling them pseudoscientific.
Zoho Company CEO Sridhar Vembu backed Kamakoti, saying these mocking cow urine fail to know evolving scientific views. Vembu drew parallels to fashionable medical developments, stating that practices like fecal transplants, which have been as soon as thought of unconventional, are actually widely known for his or her efficacy.
“The people who find themselves mocking cow urine do not understand how fecal transplants and fecal drugs (sure!) from very wholesome people (ideally from pre-industrial societies, not uncovered to fashionable diets) are seeing rising scientific curiosity on account of their position in restoring helpful intestine micro organism,” the Zoho CEO mentioned, including that intestine micro organism are probably the most very important element of our immune system and so they play an important position in our bodily and psychological well being.
“So, ‘cow urine and cow dung have helpful properties’ just isn’t some superstitious quackery. Fashionable science is converging there,” Vembu tweeted. He criticised on-line backlash as “closed-minded fanaticism” and urged skeptics to think about evolving scientific views.
Nevertheless, critics like liver specialist Dr Cyriac Abby Philips, often known as ‘The Liver Physician’ on social media, strongly opposed Vembu’s stance. Philips labeled the controversy as regressive, accusing proponents of cow urine’s advantages of spreading misinformation. He wrote on X, “As a person of affect, unfold helpful info on how as a neighborhood we will progress by science and the scientific methodology, as an alternative of selling historical nonsense and primal therapies.”
