Findings associated to the quantative section
In accordance with the assumptions of multivariate statistics, skewness and kurtosis values had been examined to find out whether or not the analysis variables exhibited a traditional distribution. Skewness and kurtosis values had been evaluated throughout the vary of +2 to −2, which is taken into account adequate for the normality assumption (Subject 2009; Trochim and Donnelly 2001). On this examine, the kurtosis values ranged from 0.069 to −1.674, and the skewness values ranged from 0.069 to −1.258, all falling throughout the +2 to −2 vary. Pearson Correlation evaluation was carried out to look at the linearity of the connection between the variables. The correlation values between the scores of the contributors relating to the variables are offered within the desk (see Desk 1).
The analyses of the mannequin examined within the analysis had been carried out utilizing the Mplus6 program, and match indices had been obtained. Within the analysis of match indices, the factors proposed by Byrne (2013) and Schermelleh-Engel et al. (2003) had been utilized as reference values. The obtained values had been as follows: χ² = 15.067; (df = 7, p < 0.05); (χ²/df) = 2.1524; RMSEA = 0.048; SRMR = 0.021; CFI = 0.994; TLI = 0.961. It’s noticed that the obtained values fall throughout the vary of fine match and acceptable match standards Desk 2.
Upon inspecting the coefficients associated to the variables, it’s evident that there exists a reasonable to low stage of impact measurement. When contemplating the defined variance values offered within the desk, it’s discovered that 15.8% of the variance in attitudes in the direction of feminine psychological courting violence inflicted (β = 0.158; p < 0.05), and 15.4% of the variance in attitudes in the direction of male psychological courting violence inflicted (β = 0.154; p < 0.05) are defined by the related exterior/impartial variables (see Desk 3).
When the direct and oblique results between the impartial and dependent variables are examined, it’s seen in Desk 4 that the connection between safe attachment and the perspective in the direction of psychological violence in courting is defined by the variable gender roles (β = −0.017; p < 0.05); that the variables of anxious attachment and avoidant attachment and attitudes in the direction of feminine psychological courting violence had been defined by way of the variable of conventional gender roles (β = 0.062, p < 0.05; β = 0.061, p < 0.01); that the connection between anxious attachment and the attitudes in the direction of male psychological courting violence is defined by the variables of parasocial empathy and conventional gender roles (β = −0.065, p < 0.01; β = 0.079, p < 0.01); It was decided that the connection between avoidant attachment and the perspective in the direction of psychological violence in courting was defined by conventional gender roles (β = 0.078; p < 0.01). It was discovered that whereas there was a selected oblique impact on egalitarian gender roles (β = −0.016; p < 0.05) between safe attachment and the male’s perspective in the direction of psychological violence in courting, the entire impact was not statistically vital (β = −0.063; p > 0.05) (see Desk 4).
Findings associated to the qualitative section
Attachment types
By means of the interpretative phenomenological evaluation of contributors’ experiences and views on attachment types, 4 principal themes emerged: ‘Self,’ ‘Attitudes in Relationships,’ ‘Analysis Tendencies in Relationships,’ and ‘Methods of Sustaining Relationships.’ These principal themes had been additional subdivided into a complete of eight subthemes: ‘Character Traits,’ ‘Self-Analysis,’ ‘Passivity in Relationships,’ ‘Adaptation,’ ‘Unfavourable Attribution to Relationship System,’ ‘Constructive Experiences,’ ‘Cautious Relationship Formation,’ and ‘Extreme Closeness.’
Self
Within the theme of self, people’ self-descriptions relating to their attributes and their psychological evaluations of themselves based mostly on these descriptions are current. The primary subtheme associated to the self emerged as persona traits. Members’ self-descriptions and ideas revealed a spread of persona traits similar to affected person, aggressive, well-meaning, calm, fragile, warm-hearted, impatient, formidable, and distant: “My identify is x, by the way in which. I’ve a reasonably calm persona. There are only a few folks I can’t get together with.” (M2) Whereas describing themselves, contributors seem to embody these definitions of their behaviors and communication patterns, notably of their interactions with others. “I normally begin speaking to folks rapidly, I rapidly provoke conversations. I can simply interact in dialog with even somebody I don’t know. I’m warm-hearted.” (M5)
One other subtheme throughout the self theme is self-evaluation. Members classify their attributes as optimistic or adverse, they usually interact in evaluations associated to satisfaction and dissatisfaction. As an illustration, participant E1, whereas itemizing their optimistic traits, states: “If I had been to charge myself on a scale of 1 to five, I’d give myself a 4….Apart from my pals round me, everybody thinks they’re by my aspect because of the vital tasks I’ve that others can’t deal with.” (M1) Participant K3 evaluates their very own attributes negatively: “They may say I’m very submissive and fragile. I’m uncomfortable with this. I wish to repair this example, however effectively, I can’t.” (F3)
Attitudes in relationships
The second principal theme in attachment types is attitudes in relationships. Expressions associated to contributors’ behaviors, feelings, and communication strategies whereas participating with others are encompassed inside this theme. Inside this principal theme, subthemes of passivity and flexibility inside relationships are recognized. It’s noticed that passive behaviors inside relationships happen both willingly by contributors or regardless of their dissatisfaction: “And likewise, I used to lack self-confidence so much. I used to be utilizing some medicines, and with their impact, I considerably improved. If it had been earlier than, I in all probability wouldn’t have the ability to take part on this examine. I couldn’t increase my hand or communicate up at school.” (F4) “To start with, it’s tough. I can’t simply talk with folks I’ve simply met. I’m not a really outgoing individual.” (F5) Members point out that throughout the subtheme of adaptability of their relationships, they undertake an perspective of getting together with everybody and accommodating: “…At first, they may be hesitant attributable to judgments or such, however afterward, they begin displaying the whole lot about themselves. As a result of I settle for folks as they’re. Even once I’m with my pals, I adapt to any scenario.” (M3) One other expertise inside this subtheme is when contributors understand conditions as threats to their boundaries; they both proceed to adapt or resolve to cease adapting: “Just lately, I minimize ties with my closest buddy. This occurred as a result of my views by myself life modified. And this didn’t sit effectively with them; they needed to chop ties….We are able to say we minimize ties as a result of I didn’t need others to have a say in my life.” (F2)
Analysis tendencies in relationships
One other principal theme associated to attachment types is the analysis tendencies in relationships. Comprising two subthemes, adverse attributions to the connection system and optimistic experiences, this theme reveals how contributors consider their relationships in numerous kinds. Throughout the subtheme of adverse attributions to the connection system, contributors attribute their relationships with relations to causes similar to the opposite occasion’s conduct or the character of the connection. For instance, they consider relationships with statements like: “How ought to I put it, my father is concerned with me, he’s like a buddy to me. He talks to me, asks me, however there’s no show of affection.” (F3) Alternatively, they consider relationships based mostly on the final traits of relationships: “We had been very open with my father, however we drifted aside for about 1–1.5 years, didn’t see one another in any respect. Even once I met him later, perhaps I met him to fill the daddy hole inside me, perhaps even to make use of him financially.” (M3) Within the subtheme of optimistic experiences, it’s noticed that optimistic developments inside negatively progressing relationships and the household relationship’s distinct worth are seen as a separate type of relationship: “However now that I’m distant, once we often meet, our relationship improves. I went by way of a brief counseling course of. Throughout that point, my consciousness about my household elevated. Subsequently, our relationship is best now.” (F5)
Relationship upkeep patterns
The ultimate principal theme in contributors’ experiences associated to attachment types is the connection upkeep patterns. This theme consists of subthemes of cautious relationship institution and extreme closeness. It delves into contributors’ accounts of how they progressed of their relationships from initiation to termination. Reflecting the mutual nature of relationships, this subtheme supplies insights into what is obtainable by each side and the way the method unfolds. Throughout the subtheme of cautious relationship institution, contributors’ methods and processes of sustaining relationships are noticed. It turns into evident that they method folks in relationships with warning and consciously or unconsciously set boundaries. As an illustration, “As restricted as potential, as level-headed as potential. I don’t have any social issues or points, however I’m as reserved as potential on the subject of my private life… So, I’ve restricted relationships with folks.” (M4) It’s famous how communication begins, progresses, and the way contributors usually anticipate the opposite aspect to take step one of their place, refraining from initiating it: “How folks talk with me is essential. If somebody appears distant to me, I’ll be distant again. But when they discuss to me brazenly and I don’t really feel uncomfortable with that openness, I’ll behave the identical manner.” (F7)
Within the subtheme of extreme closeness, contributors have conveyed their relationship experiences as quickly changing into intimate, creating an extreme attachment and affection in the direction of their companions, and experiencing sharp and abrupt endings because of the institution of intense attachment and focus. As an illustration, one participant shared, “As an illustration, with somebody I’ve by no means met earlier than, my credit score is at all times 100. However as time goes by, intentional wrongdoings cut back that credit score. In the course of a relationship, I nonetheless are typically impulsive and sensitive. In the direction of the top of the connection, I can’t acknowledge myself anymore.” (M1) It’s understood that contributors set up bonds at a stage the place they can not perform with out the opposite individual, resulting in an extreme deal with the opposite occasion within the relationship. “As a result of I are typically extra hooked up within the relationship, I like shaping my life in response to it. At a sure level, I feel it’s dangerous, however emotionally. (F5)” Feminine contributors describe their relationships with their fathers as excessively devoted. As an illustration, one participant stated, “I can’t say that I’m dedicated to my mom. I’m extra dedicated to my father. I don’t know find out how to describe it. I really like my father extra.” (F6) One other participant said, “Household is the whole lot for an individual, I assume. Particularly my father. (F4)”
Gender roles
In contributors’ views on gender, the principle themes have emerged as ‘Gender Equality’ and ‘Relationship Roles’, consisting of two principal themes, and additional categorized into 4 subthemes: ‘Equal Standing, Stereotypical Judgments, Gender Function Expectations, and Gender Function Assignments in Parenthood’. Within the described two principal themes, it’s evident that contributors assess the roles of ladies and men individually, they usually consider their statuses as ladies and men inside society distinctly.
Gender equality
Two sub-themes, specifically equal standing and stereotypes, had been recognized within the contributors’ views on gender equality. It was noticed that contributors conveyed their judgments and approaches relating to the equality of women and men, whether or not they perceived it, possessed it, or believed it existed in society. Of their evaluations of gender equality, it was famous that the anticipated behavioral patterns had been typically related. ‘I don’t suppose that is very a lot associated to gender. It additionally consists of some societal criticism….One aspect shouldn’t have a route they assume accountability for simply due to their gender or that it ought to be that manner….I don’t differentiate between women and men.’ (F5) ‘As a result of I consider in feminism. True feminism is essential; ladies and men are equal and may have equal rights. There are inevitably bodily variations, however in that scenario, I feel they need to complement one another. What I’m saying can also be legitimate for males.’ (M3) Moreover, their experiences revealed cases the place they encountered optimistic or adverse attitudes based mostly on gender: ‘Society tends to place a variety of strain on males; it’s like we don’t have the correct to be lazy about something. (M1)’“
In contributors views on gender roles, it was noticed that they held each personally fashioned and noticed stereotypes. ‘I don’t recognize a lady having a foul mouth, with the ability to curse; it’s off-putting to me, I don’t even wish to discuss to her.’ (M5) They attributed gender-specific traits, stating, ‘Aside from that, there are lots of issues imposed by society; a lady ought to be charming, lovely, enticing, I feel such issues shouldn’t exist. In fact, they may, however confining a lady in a mildew could be very unsuitable.’ (F4) Their expectations for roles and behavioral patterns had been expressed as, ‘Most significantly, it goes by way of right here. This isn’t solely associated to faith. Custom, customs, norms, these are considerably ingrained issues….However the man ought to be forward, tackle tasks sooner.’ (M4)”
Relationship roles
On this theme, it’s evident that contributors additionally consider gender throughout the context of romantic relationships, encompassing particular gender position expectations in the direction of companions and assigning gender roles in parenting. Two sub-themes emerge: gender position expectations and gender position assignments in parenting. Beneath the sub-theme of gender position expectations, it turns into obvious that there are perceived behaviors inside relationships that contributors consider ought to be exhibited or assumed by each events, girl and man, of their respective roles. They maintain notions that women and men possess sure traits inside relationships: ‘However in my view, it’s the person who ought to be extra delicate within the relationship. In spite of everything, we try to exist in a society the place girls have a tricky time. So, I feel males ought to be extra cautious in relationships.’ (F8) Relating to gender position assignments in parenting, it’s evident that contributors categorical the idea that parenthood assigns completely different societal tasks to ladies and men inside romantic relationships: ‘Maybe it might be completely different in marriage, however we simplify issues inside relationships, whereas in marriage, with youngsters and all, it turns into completely different. She turns into a mom. She assumes completely different tasks. An excellent accountability in the direction of her accomplice, in the direction of her little one.’ (F8) On this sub-theme, contributors affiliate motherhood with accountability whereas additionally positioning fatherhood as an essential position, albeit in a supportive place to motherhood: ‘Simply as a lady is supposed to be a mom, a person is equally obligated to be a father. He has to tackle the responsibility a bit extra….In my view, girls bear a a lot heavier physiological burden, together with the psychological burden, each earlier than and after childbirth. The person doesn’t undergo the identical burden, however throughout this course of, he can attempt to help in lightening or sharing the load for his accomplice. Or, after changing into a father, he has a load that comes along with his personal fatherhood, and he can willingly improve that load a bit to assist his accomplice.’ (M4)”
Media interactions
Members’ experiences and views on media interactions are comprised of three principal themes: ‘ Work together, Engagement, Social Studying Impact, and Media’s Place in Relationships,’ and 6 sub-themes: ‘Interplay with Characters, Interplay with Narrative, Direct Affect, Oblique Affect, Using Media Instruments, and Sharing the Relationship on Media.’
Inceract
Participant interactions with media content material (TV collection, films, social media movies, and so on.) are encompassed inside this principal theme. It’s noticed that contributors’ interactions are formed by engagement with characters and narratives within the content material they observe. Members’ interplay with characters within the content material they observe is manifested by way of displaying curiosity within the characters throughout the manufacturing: ‘I actually preferred the principle characters there. As an illustration, I preferred their qualities, they had been very clever, for instance, intelligence is essential within the reverse intercourse for me, they need to be clever.’ (F8) This interplay additionally entails forming a reference to the character: ‘Truly, if we speak about a personality that considerably resembles me, Tom Shelby, for example, he genuinely values the lady he loves, then he learns that the lady is a spy, and nonetheless, he doesn’t do something to hurt her… As a result of he loves her deep down, irrespective of how a lot of a spy she is, he can’t harm her.’ (M2) Moreover, contributors take note of the narrative construction of the media packages they observe, and the storyline and material of this system play a task of their curiosity: ‘The flirting as snacks in this system jogs my memory of my very own flirtation occasions, and this makes me completely satisfied. I understand I miss these occasions. (F7)’
Social studying impact
Members not solely work together with the media packages they watch but additionally categorical the methods by which they’re influenced by these packages. These results, which might have reflections on their lives or induce modifications, are categorized into two sub-themes: direct and oblique results. Throughout the sub-theme of direct results, it’s evident that the content material they eat can affect their behaviors, in addition to immediate them to make comparisons and evaluations about their present experiences and the experiences they watch: ‘Folks’s posts on Instagram have a major influence on people. Irrespective of how a lot I attempt to withstand, somebody who makes use of Instagram intensively has no probability of not being affected.’ (F2) Within the sub-theme of oblique results, contributors categorical that the content material they watch can not directly form their ideas: ‘I used to suppose that you just’ve seen this in each present, a person by no means stays with only one girl. They at all times get divorced after getting married. As a result of the present gained’t proceed in any other case, there must be one thing happening. I additionally suppose this might be potential, and it would trigger me to concern marriage.’ (F1) In addition they acknowledge the influence of media content material on their experiences: ‘As a society, by way of romantic relationships, they’ve made dedication simpler in reveals and flicks, taking it to a different stage. There’s not any dedication; they outline it as if it’s non-existent. Even when somebody cheats on another person, they nonetheless painting them as being dedicated to them.’ (M5)”
Media’s positions in relationships
It’s obvious that contributors, as media shoppers and customers, additionally contain numerous platforms of their romantic relationships. In positioning media inside their relationships, contributors categorical their views on reflecting their relationships in media and using media as instruments of their relationships. Members use media with various frequency and depth. ‘Irrespective of how a lot my girlfriend cares, it’s unimportant to me; she makes use of my account too, logs out and in, however I don’t log into hers. I don’t connect a lot significance to it. I’ll share images, typically ship tales together with her.’ (M2) It’s noticed that they use media instruments as a way of communication of their romantic relationships and have interaction in relationship-related sharing: ‘Who the alternative intercourse follows on social media isn’t essential to me. However I’d need them to share images with me.’ (F2)
Members additionally consider the appropriateness and limitations of sharing their relationships or relationship-related content material on the social media platforms they use: ‘It’s good to remind often; folks of the alternative intercourse, particularly for each side, can pose a hazard. It doesn’t should be executed always, although.’ (M6) The dimension of the connection seems to be an essential criterion for contributors when contemplating sharing content material: ‘As an illustration, I wouldn’t share one thing about them proper initially of my relationship. As a result of having folks in my life, having them learn about it, attending to know them, it must occur a bit after the connection is extra settled, when it’s throughout the framework of respect, belief, and love.’ (F5)”
Romantic relationship experiences
The qualitative analysis, carried out by way of interpretative phenomenological evaluation, delved into contributors’ romantic relationship experiences within the remaining half. Members’ romantic relationship experiences are categorized into 4 principal themes: ‘Relationship Experiences, Relationship Expectations, Points in Relationships, and Relationship Violence,’ and eight sub-themes: ‘Unfavourable Experiences, Constructive Experiences, Mutual Expectations, Jealousy as an Expectation, Causes of Relationship Issues, Continuation Regardless of Relationship Issues, Sorts of Relationship Violence, and Definitions of Psychological Violence.’
Relationship experiences
Members’ views and experiences relating to the principle theme of relationship experiences are expressed by way of two sub-themes: adverse experiences and optimistic experiences. Inside these, adverse experiences embody moments, behaviors, and phrases that embody lack of belief, publicity to bodily violence, emotions of rigidity, criticism, publicity to manipulation, exertion of strain, management and intervention on the person, indifference, distancing, and undesirable sexual contact:
“I haven’t utilized it, however I’ was uncovered to it; my present girlfriend slapped me twice. (M3)
I received actually indignant at her, pushed her away, and slapped her. She, in response, hit me in order that I’d cease pushing her and doing that. We went by way of one thing actually poisonous like this. (F6)
I used to really feel protected and trusted her so much, I imply in the whole lot, each sentence she used. However after the lies she instructed me, I began to lose belief. (F1)”
“In a sexual sense, he was always pressuring me. Even once I didn’t wish to, he would push me into issues. I’d say I don’t wish to, and he’d begin a battle. Then he’d say, ‘It’s due to you that we’re preventing. If you happen to simply agree, there wouldn’t be a battle,’ and he’d push me. He blamed me for not wanting or resisting….Aside from that, there was emotional violence relating to my pals, and so on. I began to suppose, I’ve been with these folks for 20 years, and I haven’t had a correct relationship in all that point. I’ve began to doubt myself’ (F4)”
Members categorical their optimistic relationship experiences by valuing feeling near that individual, respecting and feeling valued, and being appreciated. They spotlight mutual behaviors within the relationship: ‘As a result of she’s doing one thing that she values for me, and that makes me completely satisfied.’ (M2) In addition they emphasize their very own behaviors: ‘I typically attempt to be understanding. I respect her non-public life. I by no means undergo my boyfriend’s telephone, social media, and so on. I attempt to make her really feel trusted. I attempt to not accuse her of ridiculous issues.’ (F4) These optimistic features are evaluated as important parts of their optimistic experiences.”
Relationship expectations
Members develop expectations for his or her romantic relationships based mostly on their previous and present romantic relationship experiences, in addition to different life experiences. These expectations are divided into two sub-themes: mutual expectations and jealousy as an expectation. Inside mutual expectations, contributors need to see the behaviors they provide to their accomplice reciprocated emotionally: ‘She does what nobody else does. You know the way they are saying she sees what nobody else sees. I see that in her and she or he is aware of me very well. Equally, I do know her too.’ (M3) In addition they categorical behavioral expectations: ‘It could be higher if she let me know if she goes out. I typically do, and the opposite aspect does too. Speaking through the day earlier than going to sleep. Once we’re busy with work, each side ought to go away one another alone to deal with their work.’ (M6)
Within the second sub-theme, contributors don’t instantly categorize jealousy of their romantic relationships as optimistic or adverse. They settle for jealousy throughout the relationship to some extent, contemplate it regular in sure conditions, and situation its analysis on circumstances. One participant states, ‘In my view, jealousy is regular so long as it doesn’t go too far, which means so long as it doesn’t attain a stage that restricts life.’ (F4) Others categorical their views: ‘As an illustration, not sharing something with anybody, together with household. That may be violence. Not eager to share with the alternative intercourse, in my view, isn’t violence. In fact, there’s a level to this, however until it’s extreme, it’s not violence.’ (F3) ‘I additionally get jealous of the alternative intercourse. If there’s a sure stage of intimacy, for instance, there’s a boundary with a buddy, you discuss, you smile, however you don’t hug and kiss an excessive amount of, like with an abnormal buddy.’ (F8) ‘If the alternative intercourse tries to get near me and my accomplice notices and needs to cease them, then it doesn’t escalate into violence. There can be jealousy right here, however I don’t see something unsuitable with it when it’s executed. (M6)’ These contributors contemplate jealousy in the direction of the alternative intercourse as one thing regular.
Points in relationships
Members’ ideas and experiences relating to the issues of their relationships are gathered beneath this theme, together with how they outline the causes of relationship issues and causes for persevering with the connection regardless of these issues. The causes of relationship issues are described within the first sub-theme as associated to people’ traits in problematic conditions within the relationship: ‘Concern of dropping. Extra like a concern of dropping. Together with an absence of self-confidence, the concern of dropping comes. Typically folks can entertain these sorts of ideas or interact in these sorts of actions as a result of they love somebody a lot.’ (M2) The methods companions categorical themselves: ‘At its core, issues executed with out valuing the opposite individual, with out valuing their emotions. The way you say it’s actually essential.’ (F6) Elements similar to previous experiences and household play a task: ‘Lack of affection, typically, let’s say, individuals who apply psychological violence are those that have been subjected to it prior to now. Not being liked by their household, pushed away, belittled… They begin to undertake this, they suppose persons are at all times like this, so they begin making use of it to everybody they encounter.’ (M5) These contributors understand these elements as contributors to the emergence of problematic conditions and violence.
Members are noticed to proceed their relationships even when they’re conscious of the issues or dissatisfied with the scenario. On this rising second sub-theme, it’s evident that they discover sure issues extra acceptable throughout the relationship; they may proceed the connection regardless of these points:
A: Have you ever ever skilled bodily violence? M6: Minor issues, however I don’t suppose they had been deliberately executed.
A: Did you ever do something like that to them? M6: I did one thing small, however it wasn’t executed out of hatred.
Furthermore, it’s evident that they’ll additionally see themselves because the supply of issues. ‘Truly, I ought to have damaged up earlier than, there have been locations the place we had been sad. However it was very poisonous, and I didn’t wish to sever my ties. I didn’t need her in my life, however I felt incomplete with out her as effectively. I used to be treating her badly, I didn’t wish to do this, however I used to be treating her badly too.’ (F6)
Relationship violence
The qualitative section of the analysis was carried out with college college students who’ve skilled psychological violence of their relationships. On this context, how contributors skilled violence of their relationships emerged as the ultimate principal theme. This theme consists of two sub-themes: varieties of violence in relationships and definitions of psychological violence. In line with contributors’ opinions and experiences relating to varieties of violence, it’s evident that they outline violence in relationships as bodily, verbal, emotional, and psychological:
“‘Bodily violence, like hitting. Continually pressuring somebody on a sure situation. Continually getting indignant over dressing modestly, for instance, that’s additionally psychological violence.’ (M6)”, “‘We are able to divide it into psychological or bodily. (M4)”, “‘It might be conserving somebody beneath psychological strain. It might be making somebody really feel dangerous. It might be punishment. It’s emotionally and psychologically intertwined. Making somebody really feel dangerous about themselves.’ (F5)”
The contributors had been recognized as college college students who’ve skilled psychological violence of their relationships. When inspecting how they labeled their experiences of psychological violence and the way they outlined psychological violence, it’s noticed that they outlined psychological violence as insults, manipulation, the way in which of expression, imposition, and establishing dominance:
“Belittling somebody’s achievements, clothes, conversations with pals; belittling each conduct of that individual, demeaning them in each scenario, always humiliating them, at all times placing them down.” (F7)
“Like mobbing… It’s such a strain, such manipulation that typically folks manipulate others.” (M2)
“Making somebody really feel dangerous about themselves. Truly, these emotions aren’t yours. These ideas don’t belong to you. You’re experiencing them, however they’re not yours.” (F3)
“Attempting to make somebody do one thing they don’t wish to do by drive. Rising the dosage of this. It can be belittling. Doing this in entrance of everyone seems to be even better violence.” (M6)
“Psychological violence can be remaining unresponsive, staying silent, verbal psychological violence, and so on.” (M4)
